<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Cannabis Research Around the Corner?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mrclay.org/2009/11/10/more-cannabis-research-around-the-corner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mrclay.org/2009/11/10/more-cannabis-research-around-the-corner/</link>
	<description>Steve Clay on programming, music, public policy and other junk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 07:00:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunil Aggarwal</title>
		<link>http://www.mrclay.org/2009/11/10/more-cannabis-research-around-the-corner/comment-page-1/#comment-102428</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunil Aggarwal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrclay.org/?p=488#comment-102428</guid>
		<description>generic name for Sativex is nabiximols -- 
if they schedule that in 3 and the plant that it derives from (it&#039;s a liquid co2 extract after all), I think that would be absurd and intolerable.  Can&#039;t call cannabis inherently dangerous if a liquid form can be Rx&#039;ed over the phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>generic name for Sativex is nabiximols &#8212;<br />
if they schedule that in 3 and the plant that it derives from (it&#8217;s a liquid co2 extract after all), I think that would be absurd and intolerable.  Can&#8217;t call cannabis inherently dangerous if a liquid form can be Rx&#8217;ed over the phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

